The Loss of Liberty through Science

Do you see the two balls, click and they will turn around and turn redder? Red is bad.  They are earth images (not the mammaries of a noted burlesque dancer) showing two different global warming simulation. The one on the left is the business as usual scenario it is called A1B. In A1B we keep on burning carbon products but we introduce non fossil fuels, a balance across all sources (A1B). The second globe E1 shows with a nuance what will happen if the earth’s atmospheric (surface-air) temperature is controlled by driving down the use of carbon products so that the temperature does not rise by more the 2°C. This no more that 2°C increase appears to be the best for the earth and appears to be the best we can achieve if we all greatly suspend the use of carbon based products (Can you say  “no gasoline” or “no diesel”, children?).


A user controlled version of the video.

The true impact is not these esoteric and mysterious and rather hypnotic balls. It is not what you see it is what you do not see i.e. the lost of political power, the lost of liberty which will be necessary to effect this 2°C solution. Sharky&Sharky is going to breakdown the real impact of Global Warming to our readers. The Sharky&Sharky area of concern is that Global Warming (GW) is another power grab by politicians this time using “science” to gain control of our day to day existence, deploying gullible and naïve scientists and so-called Nobel Peace Prize winners. Sharky&Sharky are your Batman and Robin when it comes to detecting those that want to subject you to social dictatorship, whether it be through science (Global warming, diet control, etc), social equity (How do we spell health plan, children?), or social justice (Forget The Constitution let 11 million illegal Hispanics become citizens.). All of these apparent social goods are the ostensible objectives of the social dictator while the true outcome whether intended or not is social control.

Growing Emissions of CO₂, “From 19th Century until now CO₂ in the atmosphere has gone from 280ppm to 390ppm”, says Dr Slingo: Tape 1 However note in the video she goes from this falsifiable proposition to “It is hard to believe that if you increase it CO₂ by 40% that you are not going to do something to the temperature of the planet”, which is a nonfalsifiable statement. Dr. Slingo indicates that through monitoring the Met Office can correlate the increase of carbon emissions due to energy production, transportation, etc to the CO₂ levels in the atmosphere.

Now dear reader the next part requires that you energize at least half of your brain. You cannot run on regular from this point on and you must at least be in third. Ready? In the prior previous interglacial periods (IGP) the earth’s orbit changed thereby causing more solar energy to be absorbed by the earth. This increase in energy caused the earth’s biosphere to produce more CO₂. Dr. Slingo does not say what elements of the biosphere generated the increase; Sharky&Sharky missed the last interglacial period. But like most periods the old IGP is coming back according to Dr. Slingo. When you ask? Well at the end of this century; that will be around 2100. A kid born today would be 90 years old. (About the time that the Chinese and the Japanese demand that we pay our debts.) Then earthlings will have a Double Whammo of CO₂. The IGP due to GOD changing the orbit of the earth and man induced global warming. This will be like making an alimony payment and a tax payment both at the same time. (Can you say Tiger Wood, children?).

The Models that Dr. Slingo uses generate weather scenarios, and she indicates that they are very useful. They are tested based on daily weather forecasting. (Can you say accurate weather forecast, children?) If you can stand anymore science here is the good Doctor indicating how she knows what she knows. Tape 2 Net: We have just experienced the warmest decade on record. Then at the end of this tape Dr. Slingo iterates all the dreads which position policymakers for social takeover: (1) Loss of livelihood (2) Loss of island homelands (3) Loss of ocean coastal cities, (4) Food security (5) Migration of populations.

In the last tape Dr. Slingo indicates that if we dramatically reduce CO₂ emissions the dreads will be mitigated although the effects will not change anything for 30 years Tape 3 .She is shooting for limiting the air-temperature rise to 2°C over the next 90 years. (Adults, can you say "they are from the governement and they are here to help?)

Now you have the basis for the thinking about anthropogenic global warming, AGW, man-made global warming. Sharky&Sharky are not as smart as Dr. Slingo. If global warming and its ills are occurring due to AGW, then this is either true or not true; it is potentially falsifiable. We cannot know that it is absolutely true soon nor will a democratic majority admit it is true until shortly before we start choking. Further China and other developing countries will fight reduction in AGW until they have a competitive advantage over the US.

World social policy is the absolutely wrong response. We must not let AGW become the basis for a socialist takeover of the US. AGW is no reason to for US citizens to obey a social policy science driven by an international group of scientists from socialist or communist countries. The benefits of science applied to large scale social programs outside of medicine is uproven.   (Can you say California pollution control, mud slide control, or forest fire control, Children?). Potential climate crisis should not be the motivation to increase political control over the US; this is the path to worldwide social dictatorship.

We should not abandon the thoughtful responses of our capitalist democratic country. The US Policy should incent thoughtful innovative response. Long-term crisis should be a provocation to invention, innovation, and exploitation of new approaches not to line up with uniform worldwide social policy. This is a time for the US to take the lead in innovation and exploitation (Can you say jobs for mommy and daddy, Children?). This is the time for US policy to encourage multiple approaches to energy production,  transportation, and other non-carbon alternatives. A simple suggestion could be a new type of Indianapolis 500 say a Minneapolis 500 where racing cars are not allowed to use carbon based fuel as an energy source. Sharky&Sharky would say that this would cost say 5 million and over 10 years 50 million. Remember Dr. Slingo says we cannot change anything for 30 years. The Minneapolis 500 might produce a non-carbon fuel racing car in 10 years which is cheaper for everyone. We do not have to worry about the carbon car guys. Once the carbon car guys discover that Minneapolis has a competitive entry they will respond but it will be too late (Can you say GM, children)

©Sharky&Sharky